{"id":240,"date":"2011-04-21T19:35:37","date_gmt":"2011-04-21T18:35:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jonafras.conlang.org\/?p=240"},"modified":"2011-12-09T05:39:58","modified_gmt":"2011-12-09T04:39:58","slug":"internally-headed-relative-clauses-in-trurian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/jonafras.conlang.org\/?p=240","title":{"rendered":"Internally headed relative clauses in Trurian"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have recently relaunched Trurian, my first conlang (the first sketch dates to around 10 years ago). It&#8217;s a really pleasant feeling to be working on something fresh, and it&#8217;s also somewhat easier than my High Eolic work &#8211; both due to its already sizable vocabulary (2000+ entries) and since much of the grammatical legwork (especially basic morphology) is already present, which gives me more time to concentrate on the interesting stuff, such as syntax and pragmatics.<\/p>\n<p>One feature which I&#8217;ve decided to revamp considerably from previous incarnations of the language is the way relative clauses are handled. In a burst of inspiration, I&#8217;ve decided to make them <em>internally headed<\/em>: this means that the head of the relative clause only occurs <em>within the clause itself<\/em>. The clause is marked by a relativizer. If the clause acts in the role of a subject of a sentence, the relativizer is <em><strong>ner<\/strong>:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>ner <\/strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Aenith woni ilnerono<\/span> larne\u00c3\u00ad<br \/>\n<\/em><small>REL Aenith man.ACC kill.NONPAUS dangerous<\/small><br \/>\n&#8220;The man that Aenith killed [was] dangerous.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Notice how the relativizer marks the beginning of the relative clause (underlined), whereas the matrix clause (including the verb &#8211; Trurian is a verb-final language) follows. The relativized noun, <em>won <\/em>&#8216;man&#8217;, is only present within the relative clause itself<em> &#8211; <\/em>unlike in (for example) English, where it exists as a head outside of the relative clause (<em><strong>the man<\/strong> <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">that<\/span>&#8230;<\/em>)<em>, <\/em>and again as a gap within the relative clause<em> (<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">that Aennith killed [0]&#8230;<\/span>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>What happens when the role of the relativized noun in the matrix clause is something other than subject<em>?<\/em> Well, the relativizer <em>ner <\/em>also inflects for case, and its different case forms vary precisely for the role of the entity referred to in the matrix clause<em>. <\/em>So, for example, if you want to say <em>I had met the man that Aenith killed<\/em> &#8211; which would put &#8216;the man&#8217; into the <em>accusative<\/em> case of the matrix clause in the case system of Trurian &#8211; the appropriate relativizer is no longer <em>ner<\/em>, but rather <strong><em>ni <\/em><\/strong>(which I gloss as REL.ACC):<\/p>\n<p><em>elrer <\/em><strong><em>ni <\/em><\/strong><em><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Aenith woni ilnerono<\/span> in emeyon<br \/>\n<\/em><small>earlier REL.ACC Aenith man.ACC kill.NONPAUS I meet.PAUS<\/small><br \/>\n&#8220;I had met the man that Aenith killed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The form of the relativizer is independent of the role of the relativized noun within the relative clause. If you want to say <em>I met the man that killed my father<\/em>, the relativizer is still <em>ni<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>ni <\/em><\/strong><em><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">won in-idhoni ilnerono<\/span><em> in emeyon<br \/>\n<\/em><\/em><small>REL.ACC man my-father.ACC kill.NONPAUS I meet.PAUS<\/small><br \/>\n&#8220;I met the man that killed my father.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Along with the accusative, Trurian has three other noun cases: the genitive, the dative, and the ablative. The relevant relativizer forms for the role of the relativized noun in the matrix clause are <strong><em>nel <\/em><\/strong>(for the genitive), <strong><em>neth<\/em><\/strong> (for the dative), and <strong><em>ana <\/em><\/strong>(for the ablative), as you can see in the examples below:<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>nel <\/em><\/strong><em><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Aenith woni ilnerono<\/span> fes l\u00c3\u00a4rthe\u00c3\u00ads<br \/>\n<\/em><small>REL.GEN Aenith man.ACC kill.NONPAUS house big.FEM<\/small><br \/>\n&#8220;The house of the man that Aenith killed is big.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>neth <\/em><\/strong><em><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Aenith woni ilnerono<\/span> wechebi entayon<\/em><br \/>\n<small>REL.DAT Aenith man.ACC kill.NONPAUS money.ACC take.PAUS<\/small><br \/>\n&#8220;Aenith took money from the man that he killed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><em>feser <strong>ana <\/strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Aenith woni ilnerono<\/span> yon\u00c3\u00a9th<\/em><br \/>\n<small>house.ADV REL.ABL Aenith man.ACC kill.NONPAUS live.3.MASC.SING.PAUS<\/small><br \/>\n&#8220;Aenith [now] lives in the house of the man that he killed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Finally, there is an issue that I still haven&#8217;t managed to resolve fully satisfactorily, namely: how do speakers &#8220;know&#8221; which constituent within the relative clause is the relativized noun? With the examples above, it&#8217;s pretty simple to figure this out, since the non-relativized constituents are very well-known\/specific (<em>Aenith, my father<\/em>) and thus unlikely to be modified by a relative clause in any case. I&#8217;m quite prepared to put it all down to pragmatics and possible ambiguity, but maybe there&#8217;s some way around the problem.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have recently relaunched Trurian, my first conlang (the first sketch dates to around 10 years ago). It&#8217;s a really pleasant feeling to be working on something fresh, and it&#8217;s also somewhat easier than my High Eolic work &#8211; both &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/jonafras.conlang.org\/?p=240\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[4,15],"tags":[25,9,22,16],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/jonafras.conlang.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/jonafras.conlang.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/jonafras.conlang.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jonafras.conlang.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jonafras.conlang.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=240"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/jonafras.conlang.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/jonafras.conlang.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=240"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jonafras.conlang.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=240"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jonafras.conlang.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=240"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}